|
Science, Law and Human Values |
|
|
Fall 2008 |
Midterm |
|
questions 1.
Why
is the process of 'peer
review' so
important in communicating scientific findings? 2.
What
are the three most important ethical principles under the Belmont Report?
What should these principles govern? Of which principle is the requirement of
informed consent most likely to be an extension of? 3.
Is
our appreciation of life as a gift an argument in favor or against genetic
enhancement? Why? 4.
We
manipulate the environment all the time to enhance our lives as we experience
them. Why shouldn't
we able to manipulate our genes to achieve the same goal? 5.
Human
suffering can be relieved if therapeutic cloning is permissible. Is this
argument consequentialist or deontologist? Why? 6.
What
do we mean by replication of scientific findings? 7.
State
an objection against the idea that people find certain practices repulsive
and therefore unacceptable (yuk factor)? 8.
Is
the capacity of animals to feel pleasure and pain relevant from a Kantian
perspective? Why? 9.
Can
you think of a slippery slope argument discussed in class or in the readings? 10. If human clones were to be
created, would experimentation with these creatures be permissible? 11. In his article on human cloning,
Savulescu presents a series of cases involving
Lucas to prove that human cloning may be defensible. What is the purpose that
these Lucas cases serve in light of the author's argument? 12. What does the Nuremberg Code say
about animals? Is this an anthropocentric or a non-anthropocentric position?
Why? 13. Jim is egg-intolerant. Whenever
he eats eggs, his throat starts soaring and he cannot talk for three days. On
Sunday, he is invited to a brunch at a friend's house. The only dish available is egg omelet. Is
Jim free to eat the omelet? Discuss the scenario by pointing whether or not
there is a distinction between positive and negative freedom in Jim's case. 14. Why is Onora
O'Neill concerned
with the triumph of informed consent? 15. Throughout the world, many laws
prohibit abuse of animals: list and discuss in one sentence three reasons for
this prohibitions 16. What kind of issues is the
precautionary principle meant to address? 17. In what sense science can be
bad? We discussed two senses in which science can be bad. 18. What triggers the duty to submit
a research proposal to an institutional review board? 19. What are the three requirements
of informed consent? 20. Why is human cloning a matter of
meaning? Answer by discussing Kass's paper. |
Back to homepage